RE H (A CHILD) (2016)

ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE - FAMILY LAW - SENTENCING CHILDREN'S WELFARE : CIVIL CONTEMPT : COMMITTAL FOR CONTEMPT : NON-COMPLIANCE : PROHIBITED STEPS ORDERS : SUSPENDED SENTENCES A 12-month custodial sentence for contempt of court, suspended for 12 months, was not excessive for a mother who had repeatedly breached a prohibited steps order. She had been … Continue reading RE H (A CHILD) (2016)

Advertisements

(1) GLOBE MOTORS INC (2) GLOBE MOTORS PORTUGAL-MATERIAL ELECTRICO PARA A INDUSTRIA AUTOMOVEL LDA (3) SAFRAN USA INC v (1) TRW LUCAS VARITY ELECTRIC STEERING LTD (2) TRW LTD (2016)

CONTRACTS - INDUSTRY BREACH OF CONTRACT : CARS : CONTRACT TERMS : ENGINEERING : EXCLUSIVE SUPPLY AGREEMENTS : INTERPRETATION : LONG-TERM CONTRACTS : MANUFACTURING : MOTOR INDUSTRY : VARIATION : VEHICLE COMPONENTS A supplier of electric power assisted steering systems to car manufacturers was not in breach of an exclusive supply agreement when it sourced … Continue reading (1) GLOBE MOTORS INC (2) GLOBE MOTORS PORTUGAL-MATERIAL ELECTRICO PARA A INDUSTRIA AUTOMOVEL LDA (3) SAFRAN USA INC v (1) TRW LUCAS VARITY ELECTRIC STEERING LTD (2) TRW LTD (2016)

SHIPOWNERS’ MUTUAL PROTECTION & INDEMNITY ASSOCIATION (LUXEMBOURG) v CONTAINERSHIPS DENIZCILIK NAKLIYAT VE TICARET AS (2016)

INSURANCE - CIVIL PROCEDURE - SHIPPING ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTIONS : MARINE CARGO INSURANCE : PROTECTION AND INDEMNITY CLUBS : SERVICE OUT OF JURISDICTION : TIME CHARTERS The court maintained an anti-suit injunction restraining proceedings brought in Turkey against a Protection and Indemnity Club by a charterer pursuant to a right of direct action conferred by Turkish … Continue reading SHIPOWNERS’ MUTUAL PROTECTION & INDEMNITY ASSOCIATION (LUXEMBOURG) v CONTAINERSHIPS DENIZCILIK NAKLIYAT VE TICARET AS (2016)

MAYOR’S OFFICE FOR POLICING & CRIME v MITSUI SUMITOMO INSURANCE CO (EUROPE) LTD & ORS (2016)

POLICE - DAMAGES COMPENSATION : CONSEQUENTIAL LOSS : DAMAGE TO PROPERTY : POLICE AUTHORITIES : RIOT : TUMULTUOUS ASSEMBLY : RIOT (DAMAGES) ACT 1886 s.2(1) The Riot (Damages) Act 1886 s.2(1) provided compensation only for physical damage to property and not for consequential losses such as loss of profits or rent. The appellant police authority … Continue reading MAYOR’S OFFICE FOR POLICING & CRIME v MITSUI SUMITOMO INSURANCE CO (EUROPE) LTD & ORS (2016)