JAPAN MPV MOTORS LTD v REVENUE & CUSTOMS COMMISSIONERS (2016)

Where a car dealership accepted the return of a car from a customer on the ground that it was defective, and agreed to supply a different car at a future time, the date of the original sale was not the point of supply for VAT purposes. VAT was a tax on turnover generated from the sale of goods. The termination of a contract for the sale of goods meant that there had been no turnover of stock, and no consideration on which VAT could be charged. Evidence of payment on a certain date did not cause that to be the date of supply.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s